Advertisement
Do you or would you use a pen name? For all of your work or just some of it?
I have a great last name (Ferrante), but I still wonder if I would go with a pen name if I try to find a market for this quasi-romance I am writing. For the mainstream work (whatever that means), I would just use my real name.
Not that I am ashamed, I'm just thinking of future PTA meetings, etc.
Any thoughts?
I have a great last name (Ferrante), but I still wonder if I would go with a pen name if I try to find a market for this quasi-romance I am writing. For the mainstream work (whatever that means), I would just use my real name.
Not that I am ashamed, I'm just thinking of future PTA meetings, etc.
Any thoughts?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Mon, June 11, 2007 - 7:32 AMI don't think pen names are passe at all. In fact, they are an important marketing concern. Where does your last name sit on the shelf? It is good to be next to someone famous in your genre, where lots of folks will go. Like the band Blondie wanted a "B" so they could be near the Beatles. Also, how easy is your name to spell? If people hear about you can they easily Google you? Are there are bunch of other writers with the same last name or is your name so common that search results will return a ton of results that aren't you? Do you write in more than one genre? If so, they may be different enough that you want to distinguish them by author name for your readers (Anne Rice writes under three names that I know of, and Iain Banks adds a middle initial for certain novels). If you write romance novels, it is possible that the publisher will keep your name and have other people write under your name. Plus, once your name gets into the Barnes and Noble database, you are forever judged by the figures in the database. If they are good, yeah. If they aren't, you might want another name for future projects.
Needless to say, I'm not too keen to use my real name.
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Mon, June 11, 2007 - 4:09 PMI'm friends with a couple of people who have published in different genres, and who use different names (and in one case a different gender) depending on the genre.
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Thu, June 14, 2007 - 12:47 PMNope. But they aren't perceived as being needed as much as 25-50 years ago. -
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Thu, June 14, 2007 - 2:05 PMI think writers need to start using one-word pseudonyms like Madonna and Prince.
THAT would be cool. -
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Tue, July 24, 2007 - 8:16 PMGods, i can see the bookchains going apeshit...
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Thu, June 14, 2007 - 10:12 PMPen names are great, nom-de-guerres are even better.
Cool potential by-lines for Stacie:
Semper Ferrante
W.R.D. Ferrante
S. Atticus Ferrante
Esmeralda Maria Cuesta-Aragon-de Ferrante
F.X. Ferrante -
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Fri, June 15, 2007 - 6:46 AM*snicker*
That's pretty funny.I especially like "Semper Ferrante", since I work for the VA! Although I could never be in the military because I have issues with authority!
-
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Fri, June 15, 2007 - 3:28 PMJust don't use JT LeRoy. Are you familiar with the case? New developments are covered in today's New York Times:
tinyurl.com/2m6y4f -
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Fri, June 15, 2007 - 5:18 PMI've been following that story with interest. One could argue that the use of a second identity in this case goes way beyond mere pen name.
Interesting thought, though: Are writers' identities and backgrounds as important as the art they produce these days? Even in cases where the work isn't autobiographical? -
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Mon, June 18, 2007 - 8:59 AMWell, it looks like I disagree with the majority here. I can only give you the MFA version of the world, which is that pen names are out. The only reason I can see using a pen name is if your life is genuinely in danger if you publish. Or if I was going to write something to put food on the table like a romance novel (and you know the kind I'm talking about) that could actually hurt my chances of publishing the REAL work.
As an editor of a literary journal, I refuse to publish works under pseudonyms. It has come up often. In non-fiction, there's absolutely no way, as credibility is affected. But in fiction? That makes no sense to me at all.
I think the work should stand on its own merit, and I think changing a name as a marketing ploy is...something. Fortunately, I guess, I'm right there next to "Turn of the Screw," but that's not exactly flying off the shelves.
My philosophy is to be proud of what I write. And give me the credit for it when it's done. -
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Mon, June 18, 2007 - 4:04 PMAnd on the third (fourth? fifth?) hand...
A friend of mine has a novel (her first sale!) coming out next year and a second one being optioned. She submitted everything under her real name, but her publisher has asked to use only her initials because it's a western with a male protagonist and the publisher wants a non-gendered author name in order to be more attractive to a male readership.
-
Re: Are pen names PASSE?
Tue, July 24, 2007 - 8:18 PMOne reason why authors use pen names is if they are writing radically different things. Robin Hobb and Meghan Lindholm are the same person, both are successful, neither are the name on the womans driver license.
-
-
-